文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Nasar, Jamal ¹ ; Ahmad, Munir ² ; Gitari, Harun ³ ; Tang, Li ² ; Chen, Yuan ⁵ ; Zhou, Xun-Bo ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.Guangxi Univ, Coll Agr, Guangxi Key Lab Agroenvironm & Agroprod Safety, Key Lab Crop Cultivat & Physiol, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China

2.Yunnan Agr Univ, Coll Plant Protect, Kunming 650201, Peoples R China

3.Kenyatta Univ, Sch Agr & Environm Sci, Dept Agr Sci & Technol, POB 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

4.Yunnan Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Kunming 650201, Peoples R China

5.Guangxi Acad Agr Sci, Nanning 530007, Peoples R China

关键词： Intercropping; Plant nutrients; Soil nutrients; Soil enzymatic activity; crop yield; Agricultural sustainability

期刊名称：BMC PLANT BIOLOGY （ 影响因子：5.3； 五年影响因子：5.9 ）

ISSN： 1471-2229

年卷期： 2024 年 24 卷 1 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Intercropping, a widely adopted agricultural practice worldwide, aims to increase crop yield, enhance plant nutrient uptake, and optimize the utilization of natural resources, contributing to sustainable farming practices on a global scale. However, the underlying changes in soil physio-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities, which contribute to crop yield and nutrient uptake in the intercropping systems are largely unknown. Consequently, a two-year (2021-2022) field experiment was conducted on the maize/soybean intercropping practices with/without nitrogen (N) fertilization (i.e., N-0; 0 N kg ha(-1) and N-1; 225 N kg ha(-1) for maize and 100 N kg ha(-1) for soybean ) to know whether such cropping system can improve the nutrients uptake and crop yields, soil physio-chemical characteristics, and soil enzymes, which ultimately results in enhanced crop yield. The results revealed that maize intercropping treatments (i.e., N0MI and N1MI) had higher crop yield, biomass dry matter, and 1000-grain weight of maize than mono-cropping treatments (i.e., N0MM, and N1MM). Nonetheless, these parameters were optimized in N1MI treatments in both years. For instance, N1MI produced the maximum grain yield (10,105 and 11,705 kg ha(-1)), biomass dry matter (13,893 and 14,093 kg ha(-1)), and 1000-grain weight (420 and 449 g) of maize in the year 2021 and 2022, respectively. Conversely, soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., N0SI and N1SI) reduced such yield parameters for soybean. Also, the land equivalent ratio (LER) and land equivalent ratio for N fertilization (LERN) values were always greater than 1, showing the intercropping system's benefits in terms of yield and improved resource usage. Moreover, maize intercropping treatments (i.e., N0MI and N1MI) and soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., N0SI and N1SI) significantly (p < 0.05) enhanced the nutrient uptake (i.e., N, P, K, Ca, Fe, and Zn) of maize and soybean, however, these nutrients uptakes were more prominent in N1MI and N1SI treatments of maize and soybean, respectively in both years (2021 and 2022) compared with their mono-cropping treatments. Similarly, maize-soybean intercropping treatments (i.e., N0MSI and N1MSI) significantly (p < 0.05) improved the soil-based N, P, K, NH4, NO3, and soil organic matter, but, reduced the soil pH. Such maize-soybean intercropping treatments also improved the soil enzymatic activities such as protease (PT), sucrose (SC), acid phosphatase (AP), urease (UE), and catalase (CT) activities. This indicates that maize-soybean intercropping could potentially contribute to higher and better crop yield, enhanced plant nutrient uptake, improved soil nutrient pool, physio-chemical characteristics, and related soil enzymatic activities. Thus, preferring intercropping to mono-cropping could be a preferable choice for ecologically viable agricultural development.