文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Sun, Run-Ze ¹ ; Cheng, Guo ¹ ; Li, Qiang ¹ ; Zhu, Yan-Rong ¹ ; Zhang, Xue ¹ ; Wang, Yu ¹ ; He, Yan-Nan ¹ ; Li, Si-Yu ¹ ; He, ¹ ;

作者机构： 1.China Agr Univ, Coll Food Sci & Nutr Engn, Ctr Viticulture & Enol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

2.Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Viticulture & Enol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

3.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Plant Resources, Inst Bot, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China

4.CITIC Guoan Wine Co Ltd, Xinjiang 832200, Manasi, Peoples R China

5.Guangxi Acad Agr Sci, Grape & Wine Res Inst, Nanning 530007, Peoples R China

6.Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Vegetables & Flowers, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China

7.Nongfu Spring Co Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China

8.Ruifeng Oseis Yantai Wine Manor Co Ltd, Yantai 264010, Peoples R China

9.Hebei Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Biosci & Bioengn, Shijiazhuang 050018, Hebei, Peoples R China

关键词： Cluster bagging; Grape berry; Phenolic compounds; Transcriptome; Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet sauvignon; VviFLS4

期刊名称：BMC PLANT BIOLOGY （ 影响因子：4.215； 五年影响因子：4.96 ）

ISSN： 1471-2229

年卷期： 2019 年 19 卷 1 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Background: Light conditions significantly influence grape berry ripening and the accumulation of phenolic compounds, but the underlying molecular basis remains partially understood. Here, we applied integrated transcriptomics and pathway-level metabolomics analyses to investigate the effect of cluster bagging during various developmental stages on phenolic metabolism in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Results: Bagging treatments had limited effects on berry quality attributes at harvest and did not consistently affect phenolic acid biosynthesis between seasons. Significantly elevated flavan-3-ol and flavonol contents were detected in re-exposed berries after bagging during early-developmental stages, while bagging after veraison markedly inhibited skin anthocyanin accumulation. Several anthocyanin derivatives and flavonol glycosides were identified as marker phenolic metabolites for distinguishing bagged and non-bagged grapes. Coordinated transcriptional changes in the light signaling components CRY2 and HY5/HYHs, transcription regulator MYBA1, and enzymes LAR, ANR, UFGT and FLS4, coincided well with light-responsive biosynthesis of the corresponding flavonoids. The activation of multiple hormone signaling pathways after both light exclusion and re-exposure treatments was inconsistent with the changes in phenolic accumulation, indicating a limited role of plant hormones in mediating light/darkness-regulated phenolic biosynthesis processes. Furthermore, gene-gene and gene-metabolite network analyses discovered that the light-responsive expression of genes encoding bHLH, MYB, WRKY, NAC, and MADS-box transcription factors, and proteins involved in genetic information processing and epigenetic regulation such as nucleosome assembly and histone acetylation, showed a high positive correlation with grape berry phenolic accumulation in response to different light regimes. Conclusions: Altogether, our findings provide novel insights into the understanding of berry phenolic biosynthesis under light/darkness and practical guidance for improving grape features.